Category: Obama
Constitutional Crisis : Watch or Fight?
By Bubba on Mar 14, 2010 | In Corruption Culture, Commies, Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Liberal Monsters, Tea Party, Dhimmitude | Leave Comment »
Never before has a congress demonstrated such blatant disregard and contempt for our Constitution.
From House and Senate Cloakroom at Heritage Foundation:
It’s crunch time on health care. The Budget Committee will meet Monday to start marking up a shell of a Reconciliation Bill. The Rules Committee will then meet as early as Wednesday to hollow out whatever the Budget Committee passed and then insert a new bill from Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) office. The Majority is still planning to use the “Slaughter Rule” that would allow the House to pass the Senate health care bill without voting on it.
Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) is preparing to pass the health care overhaul through the House of Representatives without a vote, as was originally reported by the National Journal's Congress Daily. Mark Tapscott observes that such a maneuver would be the penultimate refutation of the people's will.
In the Slaughter Solution, the rule would declare that the House "deems" the Senate version of Obamacare to have been passed by the House. House members would still have to vote on whether to accept the rule, but they would then be able to say they only voted for a rule, not for the bill itself.
Thus, Slaughter is preparing a rule that would consider the Senate bill "passed" once the House approves a corrections bill that would make changes. Democrats would thereby avoid a direct vote on the health care bill while allowing it to become law!
From the United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 7
Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively...
Mark Levin:
... this clause goes to the heart of this Republic.
This clause goes to the heart of how our representative body, that is Congress, makes laws. And so I want you to [observe] how particular the Framers were... They have to pass a Bill to present it to the President...
This is one of the most exacting clauses in the Constitution.
And, to the best of my knowledge, which extends over three decades, no Congress has previously tried to institute policies without actual statutes.
Here we have the President of the United States and Congressional leaders actually talking about the possibility of a brazen and open violation of one of the most fundamental aspects of our Constitution and Republic! How we actually make laws!
Let me be as clear as I know how. If this is done, this will create the greatest Constitutional crisis since the Civil War. It would be 100 times worse than Watergate.
...
This is a crucial lesson for those of you who... aren't sure what your beliefs are, or if you have any beliefs. Or aren't sure if you even care. We have an effort underway by the one of the most powerful chairmen in Congress, the woman who heads the Rules Committee, ...openly discussing gutting Congress. Gutting Congress.
And if this is done, this is about as close to martial law as you'll ever get... So Louise Slaughter, a Representative from New York, is discussing, in essence, martial law. Now I can tell you, if they pursue this process, and try to impose this kind of a law, without actually passing a statute, that I will be in a race -- with scores of others -- to the courthouse to stop this.
I can't think of a more blatant violation of the U.S. Constitution than this. And the liberal media has essentially ignored it!
...It's not only absurd on its face -- that these power-hungry ideologues, party-first-country-second types, would make the claim that the House voted on something it never voted on... that's not only absurd on its face, it's blatantly unconstitutional!
Here's the question: What are you going to do?
Are you going to watch it happen or go fight?
Will you mind your own business while this vile congress pisses on your Constitution? Or will you fight?
Fight in D.C.
March 16th - The People's Surge against Obamacare 2.0
FreedomWorks will be joining Tea Party groups and all other organizations that are fighting to defeat Obamacare 2.0. Please join us in DC to lobby our congressmen to VOTE NO on Obamacare 2.0. Join us Tuesday, March 16th, beginning at 9:00am outside the Cannon House Office Building (Independence Ave. SE and New Jersey SE). We will be storming the three House Office Buildings: Cannon, Longworth and Rayburn. Our message is simple: VOTE NO
Fight via Phone and Email
This link contains contact information on all the congress-holes. Use it.
Contact info for all the NC senator and representatives in DC
More?
Van Hollen Advises Silence on Unconstitutional ObamaCare Procedure
March 16th: If You Prick Them, They Will Bleed
The Culture War Is Not Over, The Larger War For Liberty Has Begun
.
.
.
The Communist in Our White House
By Bubba on Mar 8, 2010 | In Corruption Culture, Obama, Tea Party | Leave Comment »
Posted by permission of the author,
Richard Newton, The Right Side of the Issues
There are those among us who would argue that we are in the midst of a second American revolution – a revolution to reject and discard conservative values and principles, our Constitution, and our freedoms. Those instigating the revolution, however, will not declare their full intentions until they are convinced that they have a virtual stranglehold on our country. To do otherwise, would be to awaken a sleeping giant.
And so, the time is now - for American conservatives and Tea Party patriots to awaken the giant. Yes, some successes are clearly visible, particularly in terms of recent election results and in the prospects for further election victories for conservatives in November. But mere voting will not suffice if we fail to address the complacency that allowed this cancerous revolution to grow in the first place. It exists not only in government, but more importantly, in our schools and our media. It is time to awaken America from its self-induced stupor of apathy. It is time for all freedom-loving Americans to pay attention to the world around them, to become better informed, and to take personal responsibility for maintaining our freedom.
We cannot afford to assume that good, honest people will guide our country as they have for the better part of 234 years. We cannot afford for people to turn off their listening to politics, whether it be for lack of understanding, lack of interest, or desire to avoid confrontation. We cannot afford to bypass voting in seemingly unimportant local and primary elections. We cannot afford a reliance upon ‘the other guy’ to serve in public roles or to be advocates for various issues. We cannot afford to blindly accept the biased drivel of liberal hacks in the media. And we cannot afford to allow the increasingly liberal influence in academia to destroy the learning and moral fiber of our children. We must understand what we believe in, take ownership for its manifestation and survival, and share information that furthers the success of that survival.
In writing frequently about the liberal hijacking of our present society, I am often puzzled by so many pundits who have tiptoed around the use of definable terms such as socialist, Marxist, communist, collectivist, etc. Even in the 2008 presidential primaries and general elections, the closest most candidates or pundits would get to defining Obama was the ‘s-word’. Is it some McCarthy-like phobia that prevents the application of an all-to-accurate label describing a left-winger’s ideology? We know that leftist political candidates shun the ‘liberal’ label – it’s a known negative connotation to the majority of Americans. More recently, many lefties such as Obama and Hillary have donned the ‘progressive’ label. And thanks to our friend, Glenn Beck, that will soon likely become a new curse for politicians.
But why has there been such a hesitancy use to the ‘communist’ and ‘Marxist’ labels? To their credit, Beck, Levin, and Rush flirt with both of these labels, but this video by Victoria Jackson leaves little doubt and is much more than a hoot – it’s a clarion call to all the sleepy-eyed, apathetic Americans who think the Obama/Pelosi/Reid triumvirate and all the socialist minions in Congress are a harmless, passing fad.
It’s also a wakeup call for all Democrats who let their party loyalty create such a blind spot that they can’t differentiate ‘Hopey/Changey’ slogans from Marxist ideology and who can’t recognize a communist when they’re spewing their propaganda right in front of them, lying through their teeth with every breath, and steadily, intentionally causing the collapse of our economy and freedoms.
Certainly, this video is not going to change minds on its own merit. One must also have been paying attention to the continual barrage of Obama’s Marxist messages/actions and his cadre of radical associates and influences. Consider the following:
- The manifestation of Obama’s collectivist doctrine of transformation in our schools. Glenn Beck’s March 5th episode brought Obama’s tactics into clear focus. A champion of freedom does not belittle the knowledge and influence of the parents nor subjugate their role in raising children to that of the state.
- His infamous SEIU address where he reaches into his oratorical bag of tricks for what Harry Reid would likely describe as his ‘ghetto dialect’ – and proceeds to offer a freedom-threatening, narcissistic message to his following of union goons on how he will overthrow this country.
- His pre-election proclamation that we are “five days away from fundamentally transforming America”. It was not a promise of fighting for freedom and opportunity – it was a threat of chains and control.
- His insistence to undertake unfathomable debt – debt that no reasonable person would ever mimic in their personal finances and debt to which only a person who is hell-bent on collapsing our economy would aspire.
- His insistence to urgently pass a massive ‘stimulus’ bill that to this date remains largely unspent and exists as a convenient slush fund for his pet projects and ‘negotiations’/bribes.
- His desire to reduce our nuclear defenses and to remove defensive shields in eastern Europe.
- His gracious, unapologetic acceptance of a book from avowed Marxist Hugo Chavez – a true patriotic leader would have simply said “No thank you.” and turned away.
- Apologizing for America’s successes, our Exceptionalism, and our foundation of Christianity.
- Lying to shun the use of a 51-vote majority – except when it’s convenient to pass healthcare legislation that the majority of the country opposes – to call it democracy in action, but conveniently forgetting that we are not just a democracy, but a democratic republic. He refuses to acknowledge the majority opposition in this country to his proposal to destroy healthcare and grow the government.
- His appointments of numerous communists and extreme leftists to his administration.
- His preference in school to associate with the Marxist professors.
- His mentoring by communist Frank Marshall Davis and his association with such societal deviates, radicals, and criminals such as William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Rashid Khalidi, and Tony Rezko.
True to his history, beliefs, and associations, Obama has left a trail of Marxist stains at every turn in his presidency. And to that minority of people who actually recognize and subscribe to the radical transformation that this president is attempting to impose upon us, be aware that those of us who cherish our country, our freedoms, and our Constitution are prepared to defend them with every ounce of energy and commitment that we can muster. But we must act with determination now. This is not a mere contest of ideologies nor of compatible belief systems that can survive through bipartisanship – rather, this is a battle for the survival and control of our nation. And make no mistake about it, we will defeat whosoever gets in the way – one way or another.
.
.
.
Not Exactly ...
By Bubba on Feb 9, 2010 | In Obama | Leave Comment »
This one has been circulating the email networks for a while, and for good reason.
1. "Selma Got Me Born" - NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965. (Google 'Obama Selma' for his full
March 4, 2007 speech and articles about its various untruths.)
2. "Father Was A Goat Herder" - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.
3. "Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter" - NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.
4. "My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom" - NOT EXACTLY, your cousin Raila Odinga, has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya. It is the first widespread violence in decades. The current government is pro-American, but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Obama, is Odinga's follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on the phone
Check out the following link for verification of that, and more. Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers burned Christians' homes and then burned men, women and children alive in a Christian church where they took shelter.
Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before the election process her started.
Google http://www.google.com/Obama - Obama and Odinga; see what you get. No one wants to know the truth.
5. "My (black) Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian" - NOT EXACTLY, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5 am, according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.
6. "My Name is African Swahili" - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. 'Hussein' is also Arabic and so is 'Obama'.NOTE: BARAK OBAMA or UBAMA in fact translates "lightening from heaven" See Luke 10:17-18
Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. He is the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian (from his mother's side) and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro (from his father's side). While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya, his father's family were mainly Arabs... Barack Hussein Obama's father wasonly 12.5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro).
7. "I Never Practiced Islam" - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years, until your wife made you change, so you could run for
office. Question; Does that mean he was married as a muslin in his church of 20 years, or have I got that confused ??)
8. "My School In Indonesia Was Christian" - NOT EXACTLY, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book). February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as 'one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.' This is just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says 'Obama's narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts.'
9. "I Was Fluent In Indonesian" - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says that you could speak the language.
10. "Because I Lived In Indonesia, I Have More Foreign Experience"- NOT EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons??
11. "I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs" - NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.
12. "I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion" - NOT EXACTLY, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya, and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.
13. "An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office" - NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and apparently never did, exist..
14. "A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life" - NOT EXACTLY, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and apparently never did, exist.
15. "I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08" - NOT EXACTLY, here you are, despite saying, live on TV, that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.
16. "Voting 'Present' is Common In Illinois Senate" - NOT EXACTLY, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES.
17."Oops, I Mis-voted" - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your mis-vote.
18. "I Was A Professor Of Law" - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer - - ON LEAVE.
19. "I Was A Constitutional Lawyer" - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer - - ON LEAVE.
20. "Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill" - NOT EXACTLY, you didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it.
21. "The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass" - NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days from start to finish.
22. "I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill" - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.
23. "I Have Released My State Records" - NOTEXACTLY, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.
24. "I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess" - NOT EXACTLY,you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens. You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.
25. "My Economics Bill Will Help America" - NOT EXACTLY, your bills economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, - - and even YOU voted against your own bill.
26. "I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois" - NOT EXACTLY, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part during your time in the State Senate.
27. "I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year" - NOT EXACTLY, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.
28. "No One on My Campaign Contacted Canada about NAFTA" - NOT EXACTLY, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.
29. "I Am Tough On Terrorism" - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel.
30. "I Want All Votes To Count" - NOT EXACTLY, you said let the delegates decide..
31. "I Want Americans To Decide" - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.
32. "I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate" - NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.
33. "I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics" - NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you in Illinois.
34. "I Don't Take PAC! Money" - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.
35. "I Don't Have Lobbyists" - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.
36. "My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad" - NOT EXACTLY, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple (http://www.apple.com/>) in one afternoon.
37. "I Have Always Been Against Iraq" - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.
38. "I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care" -NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it.
This is an election year for Congress. Make sure you're registered and ready. If we are to have a chance to restore this country to any sort of order, it must be now. In 2 more years, there will be nothing left to restore. Let's remind everyone in Washington and all of Obama's banking cronies that "Paybacks are Hell". Every politician that helped put this lying bum in office needs to feel the heat!!
PBO Bingo
By Bubba on Jan 27, 2010 | In Obama, Just Sayin' | Leave Comment »
Rush Radio 106.1FM (WRDU.com) has downloadable PBO Bingo Cards!
Get your one-Of-A-Kind P-Bo B-I-N-G-O Cards ... Play along tonight while watching the State Of The Union Address.
Breitbart Remembers Obama Promises
By Bubba on Jan 6, 2010 | In Corruption Culture, Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Liberal Monsters | 1 feedback »
Breitbart has compiled a single video from 8 different instances in which Obama made the campaign promise that the Health Care debate would be televised via CSPAN, that all deliberation would be done in the open - no secret meetings, no closed doors.
The CSPAN lie was one part of Obama's so-called 'transparency' campaign hype. Making promises for others to fulfill, promises of which he never had any hope or intention of keeping. Promises that were nothing more than rhetoric.
52% of voters fell for it.
INTERPOL, U.N., Obama: Up Against the Wall you Redneck Mo....
By Bubba on Dec 27, 2009 | In Corruption Culture, Commies, Obama, Liberal Monsters | Leave Comment »
Well now, aint this interesting ...
» Interpol and U.N. Back 'Global Policing Doctrine’
We've been wondering what Obama could possibly be thinking or gaining by giving diplomatic immunity to INTERPOL. Perhaps this is why?
Interpol and the United Nations are poised to become partners in fighting crime by jointly grooming a global police force ...
Big Brother is bringing in Big Cousin, Big Aunt and Big Granny.
.
.
.
Dear Senator ... (Updated)
By Bubba on Dec 24, 2009 | In Corruption Culture, Commies, Obama, Liberal Monsters, Dhimmitude | 2 feedbacks »
Senator Kay Hagan,
During your first year in office you have schlepped along as the caboose in the socialist rumba of the dhimmicrat party, following the Reid lead, ignoring the ever frequent tap, tap, tap on the shoulder from the ever patient constituents who have tried and tried to break in on the dance to get a few steps with you.
We the People have written you letters, called your phones, protested at your offices, and marched in the streets of North Carolina and Washington trying to tell you that we don't want the socialism you keep voting for.
You are not listening. You're too busy trying to get on the front porch of the Obama Joker Club House. Well, Kay, now that you've signed onto and helped pass the most unconstitutional legislation ever, the Socialist Hellth Scare Bull, you have finally earned your grease paint.

Welcome to the club.

Kay has answered ...
with a form letter.
December 25, 2009
Dear Friend,
I wanted to take a moment to thank you for contacting me to share your thoughts and opinions. Since taking office, I have received an overwhelming number of calls and emails from North Carolinians like you who are ready to take an active part in our government. I appreciate each and every call and email. With our country facing some of its toughest challenges in a generation, your phone calls and messages are an important factor guiding my work here in Washington. Please be assured that we will get back to you as soon as possible regarding your specific concern.
I would like to take this opportunity to share my website with you. Please visit Hagan.Senate.Gov to find contact information for my offices and to stay updated as my new state offices open. You can also find information there about what I've been doing in North Carolina and Washington. It is an honor to serve as your United States Senator and I sincerely hope you will not hesitate to contact me at any time to share your concerns and voice your opinions on our country's most pressing issues.
Some Things You Need To Know
By Bubba on Dec 12, 2009 | In Corruption Culture, Obama | Leave Comment »
About Obama Democrats’ Binge Spending
1. Dems Will Pay For Binge Spending With $1.8 Trillion Increase In Limit On Taxpayers’ Credit Card, Largest 1-Time Increase In History. (David Rogers, “Dems To Lift Debt Ceiling By $1.8 Trillion, Fear 2010 Backlash,” Politico, 12/9/09; White House Office Of Management And Budget, “Table 7.3—Statutory Limits On Federal Debt: 1940-Current,” Accessed 12/11/09)
2. Obama’s Deficit In 1st Month Of 1st Full Fiscal Year: $176 Billion; Deficit During Bush’s Entire 1st Full Fiscal Year: $159 Billion. (Monthly Budget Review: Fiscal Year 2002: A Congressional Budget Office Analysis, Congressional Budget Office, 11/8/02; Jeanne Sahadi, “October Deficit $176 Billion,” CNNMoney.com, 12/10/09)
3. Obama Rang Up Record-Setting $1.42 Trillion Deficit In 1st Year In Office, Nearly Triple The Previous Record. (David Jackson, “Obama Team Makes It Official, Budget Deficit Hits Record. By A Lot,” USA Today's “The Oval” Blog, 10/16/09)
4. Obama’s Non-Defense Discretionary Spending To Increase By 16 Percent This Year, Highest 1-Year Increase Since Jimmy Carter In 1978. (White House Office Of Management And Budget, “Table 8.7—Outlays For Discretionary Programs: 1962–2014,” Accessed 12/11/09)
5. Obama’s Binge Spending Will Nearly Double National Debt Over 9 Years, From $11.9 Trillion To $23 Trillion. (White House Office Of Management And Budget, “Mid-Session Review: Fiscal Year 2010,” 8/25/09)
6. Obama’s Binge Spending Will Lead To National Debt Being 76 Percent Of GDP By 2019, Largest Percentage In 60 Years. (“Report To The Secretary Of The Treasury: Financial Audit: Bureau Of The Public Debt’s Fiscal Years 2009 And 2008 Schedules Of Federal Debt,” United States Government Accounting Office, 11/09; Lori Montgomery, “Deficit Projected To Soar With New Programs,” The Washington Post, 8/26/09)
7. Obama Has Increased Size Of Government By 64 Percent Since Taking Office, Largest Increase In At Least 3 Decades. (White House Office Of Management And Budget, “Discretionary Budget Authority By Agency: 1976-2014,” Accessed, 12/11/09)
You May Recall ...
By Bubba on Nov 15, 2009 | In Corruption Culture, Obama, Liberal Monsters, Just Sayin' | Leave Comment »
You will recall that, shortly before the end of the 2008 political campaign, the White House announced a threat to the entire financial system and called on Congress to enact emergency spending powers. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 was enacted on October 3, 2008.
Just eighteen days earlier an event occurred that slid under the radar screen of virtually the entire mainstream media. On Thursday, September 15, 2008, at approximately 11 A.M., the Federal Reserve noticed a tremendous draw down of money market accounts in the nation, amounting to $550 billion dollars. It occurred within an hour or two. The money was removed electronically.
It has never been made public which accounts were affected, nor where the withdrawn funds were sent. If we knew those facts, we would know who launched an attack on the United States that has been more devastating than any in our history.
A Man-Made Financial Disaster
Had the Federal Reserve not closed down the accounts involved it is estimated that by 2 P.M. $5.5 trillion would have been withdrawn and the entire economy of the nation would have collapsed. It would have been followed within a day with the collapse of the world’s economy.
On February 16, 2009 we ran the following link here on this website:
» Rep. Kanjorski Drops Bomb... US Financial System Was Attacked On September 11th
Since then, what have we heard about this from the MSM? From Obama? From the Dhimmicrat Congress?
Aaar ye holdin' yer breath, lad? Well don't.
There will be no serious inquiries into the event that ended the chances of a Republican victory over Thee Obama, even though it appears that America was attacked - at a very critical political point in time - and our entire financial system targeted for complete failure.
~~ thanks Mike Blankenship, for bringing it up ~~
Obama Pushing a "Radical's Radical" to the Federal Bench
By Bubba on Nov 12, 2009 | In Guns, Commies, Obama | Leave Comment »
This is Grass Roots North Carolina Alert 11-12-09
We wish to bring the following alert sent out by our friends at Gun
Owners of American to your attention.
---------------
Thursday, November 12, 2009
He has been called "extreme" by some. But to others, he's beyond
extreme... he's a "Radical's Radical."
Whatever he is, he could become President Obama's next choice for the
federal judiciary.
This radical is Judge David Hamilton, and he's been nominated for a
position on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Hamilton has made many political enemies on the right, seeing that
his politics are to the far left of the political spectrum. Oh yes,
judges aren't supposed to be political, but this one has engaged in
quite a bit of leftist activism.
His biggest opponent on Capitol Hill is Senator Jeff Sessions of
Alabama, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Based
on his analysis of Hamilton, gun owners should be very concerned about
a judge who is all to willing to "amend the Constitution." According
to Senator Sessions:
Judge Hamilton stated in a 2003 speech that the role of a judge
includes writing footnotes to the Constitution: "Judge S. Hugh Dillin
of this court has said that part of our job here as judges is to write
a series of footnotes to the Constitution. We all do that every year
in cases large and small." In explaining this statement to Senator
Hatch, Judge Hamilton wrote that he believes the Framers intended
judges to amend the Constitution through evolving case law.
Of course, we have seen this pattern time and time again. Judges
ignore the clear wording of the Constitution -- in essence, amending
the Constitution through each new case they decide.
The courts then become the vehicle for rewriting the Second
Amendment!
Not surprisingly, Judge Hamilton's politics are to the extreme, far
left. He spent a brief stint as a fundraiser for ACORN, the
organization that was an aggressive supporter of Barack Obama in the
presidential election. In addition to all the evils surrounding ACORN
is the fact that the organization has lobbied against Second Amendment
rights -- as seen by the New Jersey chapter supporting a
one-gun-a-month ordinance in Jersey City.
Certainly any judicial nomination put forth by our anti-gun President
is suspect, but it's interesting to note who his chief backer is in
the U.S. Senate. It's none other than Senator Richard Lugar of
Indiana, who holds an "F" rating from Gun Owners of America.
Lugar has never failed to support one of Obama's anti-gun
nominations, as evidenced by his votes for Attorney General Eric
Holder, State Department lawyer Harold Koh, Supreme Court Justice
Sonia Sotomayor and the incredibly wacky Regulatory Czar Cass
Sunstein.
On policy questions, Senator Lugar is no better. To wit, he voted
against repealing the gun ban in Washington, DC this year.
Considering Hamilton's extreme track record, it's no wonder that
Senator Lugar -- in introducing Hamilton to his colleagues -- begged
his fellow Senators to ignore the judge's policy views. Lugar asked
them not to base their votes on "partisan considerations, much less on
how we hope or predict a given judicial nominee will 'vote' on
particular issues of public moment or controversy."
Instead, Lugar asked his colleagues "to evaluate judicial candidates
on whether they have the requisite intellect, experience, character
and temperament that Americans deserve from their judges...."
In other words, ignore Judge Hamilton's liberalism and just vote for
him because he's so smart and because he's such a nice guy!
Judge Hamilton's rulings have made a lot of enemies on the political
right, especially the one in Hinrichs v. Bosma where, according to a
November 3 editorial in The Washington Times, he "prohibited prayers
in the Indiana House of Representatives that expressly mentioned Jesus
Christ... yet he allowed prayers which mentioned Allah."
Gun owners have much to be concerned about, as well. Anytime a judge
who believes in rewriting the Constitution is elevated to sit as an
appellate judge, that's a scary thing -- especially given the fact
that most cases never reach the U.S. Supreme Court and are, thus,
decided at lower levels in the federal judiciary.
IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED
* Contact Sen. Kay Hagan 202-224-6342, Fax: 202-228-2563,
http://hagan.senate.gov/?p=contact
* Contact Sen. Richard Burr 202-224-3154, Fax: 202-228-2981,
http://burr.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
----- Pre-written letter -----
Dear Senator:
I urge you to vote against Judge David Hamilton for the Seventh
Circuit Court of Appeals. In addition to opposing his far left views,
I don't appreciate his disdain for the Constitution.
To quote Senator Sessions, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary
Committee:
"Judge Hamilton stated in a 2003 speech that the role of a judge
includes writing footnotes to the Constitution: 'Judge S. Hugh Dillin
of this court has said that part of our job here as judges is to write
a series of footnotes to the Constitution. We all do that every year
in cases large and small.' In explaining this statement to Senator
Hatch, Judge Hamilton wrote that he believes the Framers intended
judges to amend the Constitution through evolving case law."
Of course, we have seen this pattern time and time again. Judges
ignore the clear wording of the Constitution -- in essence, amending
the Constitution through each new case they decide.
The courts then become the vehicle for rewriting the Second
Amendment!
Not surprisingly, Judge Hamilton's written answers to the Senate
Judiciary Committee show his lack of understanding regarding the
Second and Fourteenth Amendments. While Hamilton cannot ignore what
the Supreme Court said in DC v. Heller (2008), he refuses to admit
that the individual right to keep and bear arms applies anywhere
outside of Washington, D.C. -- instead, he just says he will rely on
evolving "case law developed in earlier incorporation cases."
Once again, evolving case law -- more often than not -- takes us away
from what the Constitution actually says.
Please vote NO on David Hamilton.
Sincerely,
----------------------
You may find your NC representative by going here:
http://www.grnc.org/contact_reps.htm
You may write your federal congressman by going here:
.
.
.
Forgive Me, Mr. Ross
By Bubba on Nov 11, 2009 | In Corruption Culture, Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Sharpton, Rangel, RINOs, Liberal Monsters, ACORN | Leave Comment »
Read This First
The words below are not my own. I stole them from When Plunder Becomes a Way of Life at Doug Ross Journal.
I reproduce Mr. Ross' words here because the truth of these words is too important to exist in only one website.
~~ Bubba
When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it. --Frederic Bastiat
Last week the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its national "under-employment" (or U-6) rate for October: it was 17.5%, a big jump from 17% in September and a major leap from the 10.6% figure of September 2008.
Unemployment keeps climbing, even though President and Congress spent more than $787 billion dollars in taxpayer funds for a stimulus package.
Since that time, neither the President nor Congress have spent an iota of effort analyzing the impact of the stimulus program.
And they've not taken a moment to consider alternatives that might help alleviate the economic pain felt by so many Americans.
The President and Congress continue to ignore the economy while they pursue their ideological agenda of truly massive government.
Anyone who has lost a job, can't find a job, is nervous about losing their job, or simply lives in an area decimated by job loss should be livid over a President and Congress that spend all of their time plotting a takeover of health care.
Even though the economy is the top concern for almost every American, the oligarchy in Washington is fixated on nationalizing health care and exacting carbon taxes on every sector of the economy.
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) broke committee rules and slammed an energy-rationing bill through the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee last week without a single Republican present.
The bill would curtail America's ability to exploit its own natural resources to harvest energy and boost economic activity. Thus, despite the economic crisis, the government is turning its back on $1.7 trillion in tax revenue and tens of thousands of real jobs (i.e., non-government payroll).
Democrats are only concerned with their big-government agenda -- nationalizing the health care industry, carbon taxes and amnesty for illegal aliens -- and not worried a bit about American jobs. Each of their programs raises taxes and fees on job creators, which further harms the economy.
Both the health care and cap-and-trade bills translate to huge tax hikes for most Americans.
Frighteningly, even the 17.5% under-employment figure understates things. During the Clinton administration, the BLS began removing those 'too discouraged' to look for a job for more than a year. John Williams of Shadow Government Stats thinks the true unemployment rate would be 22.1 percent if everyone were included.
Meanwhile, Congress fiddles while the economy burns. As I said more than six months ago, this willful abandonment of Americans in economic distress is intentional.
As Rahm Emanuel told the New York Times after the 2008 election, "Rule 1 -- never allow a crisis to go to waste."
The President and Congress simply ignore high unemployment while plotting their next moves to bankrupt the country. They are violating the Constitution. They meet and maneuver and vote -- not in the tradition of this nation -- but of totalitarian regimes.
They vote late Saturday night, when the public isn't watching. Meeting behind closed doors -- one party and one party only. Changing the locks on the committee room doors to exclude the opposition party and prevent debate. Everything is done in secret until they drop a massive, 2,000-page bill on an unsuspecting public.
And that doesn't even include the regulations to implement the bill, which will be ten times longer! And it affects your life, your livelihood, your family. And you -- don't -- have -- access to it, or them.
Only the oligarchs, who laugh off high unemployment, get a say in how you will live. And they don't give a damn about anything but accruing more power and growing the size of government.

















Mike Hendrix of ColdFury.com
Michelle Malkin









































