Categories: Corruption Culture, ACORN, Kokesh, Obama, Pelosi, Rangel, Reid, Sharpton
Constitutional Crisis : Watch or Fight?
By Bubba on Mar 14, 2010 | In Corruption Culture, Commies, Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Liberal Monsters, Tea Party, Dhimmitude | Leave Comment »
Never before has a congress demonstrated such blatant disregard and contempt for our Constitution.
From House and Senate Cloakroom at Heritage Foundation:
It’s crunch time on health care. The Budget Committee will meet Monday to start marking up a shell of a Reconciliation Bill. The Rules Committee will then meet as early as Wednesday to hollow out whatever the Budget Committee passed and then insert a new bill from Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) office. The Majority is still planning to use the “Slaughter Rule” that would allow the House to pass the Senate health care bill without voting on it.
Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) is preparing to pass the health care overhaul through the House of Representatives without a vote, as was originally reported by the National Journal's Congress Daily. Mark Tapscott observes that such a maneuver would be the penultimate refutation of the people's will.
In the Slaughter Solution, the rule would declare that the House "deems" the Senate version of Obamacare to have been passed by the House. House members would still have to vote on whether to accept the rule, but they would then be able to say they only voted for a rule, not for the bill itself.
Thus, Slaughter is preparing a rule that would consider the Senate bill "passed" once the House approves a corrections bill that would make changes. Democrats would thereby avoid a direct vote on the health care bill while allowing it to become law!
From the United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 7
Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively...
Mark Levin:
... this clause goes to the heart of this Republic.
This clause goes to the heart of how our representative body, that is Congress, makes laws. And so I want you to [observe] how particular the Framers were... They have to pass a Bill to present it to the President...
This is one of the most exacting clauses in the Constitution.
And, to the best of my knowledge, which extends over three decades, no Congress has previously tried to institute policies without actual statutes.
Here we have the President of the United States and Congressional leaders actually talking about the possibility of a brazen and open violation of one of the most fundamental aspects of our Constitution and Republic! How we actually make laws!
Let me be as clear as I know how. If this is done, this will create the greatest Constitutional crisis since the Civil War. It would be 100 times worse than Watergate.
...
This is a crucial lesson for those of you who... aren't sure what your beliefs are, or if you have any beliefs. Or aren't sure if you even care. We have an effort underway by the one of the most powerful chairmen in Congress, the woman who heads the Rules Committee, ...openly discussing gutting Congress. Gutting Congress.
And if this is done, this is about as close to martial law as you'll ever get... So Louise Slaughter, a Representative from New York, is discussing, in essence, martial law. Now I can tell you, if they pursue this process, and try to impose this kind of a law, without actually passing a statute, that I will be in a race -- with scores of others -- to the courthouse to stop this.
I can't think of a more blatant violation of the U.S. Constitution than this. And the liberal media has essentially ignored it!
...It's not only absurd on its face -- that these power-hungry ideologues, party-first-country-second types, would make the claim that the House voted on something it never voted on... that's not only absurd on its face, it's blatantly unconstitutional!
Here's the question: What are you going to do?
Are you going to watch it happen or go fight?
Will you mind your own business while this vile congress pisses on your Constitution? Or will you fight?
Fight in D.C.
March 16th - The People's Surge against Obamacare 2.0
FreedomWorks will be joining Tea Party groups and all other organizations that are fighting to defeat Obamacare 2.0. Please join us in DC to lobby our congressmen to VOTE NO on Obamacare 2.0. Join us Tuesday, March 16th, beginning at 9:00am outside the Cannon House Office Building (Independence Ave. SE and New Jersey SE). We will be storming the three House Office Buildings: Cannon, Longworth and Rayburn. Our message is simple: VOTE NO
Fight via Phone and Email
This link contains contact information on all the congress-holes. Use it.
Contact info for all the NC senator and representatives in DC
More?
Van Hollen Advises Silence on Unconstitutional ObamaCare Procedure
March 16th: If You Prick Them, They Will Bleed
The Culture War Is Not Over, The Larger War For Liberty Has Begun
.
.
.
A Dishonored Marine (Bumped Up)
By Bubba on Mar 9, 2010 | In Pauly-Jonesy, Kokesh | 3 feedbacks »
A Vietnam Veteran Speaks Out
March 6, 2010
Adam Kokesh, candidate for the Republican nomination for the US House of Representatives from the Third District of New Mexico, is doing his best to deceive the electorate. He portrays himself as a libertarian conservative, but he is neither libertarian nor conservative (unless he reinvents himself again). Most egregiously, he is attempting to portray himself as a patriotic anti-war/anti-military veteran in a manner reminiscent of John Kerry and Vietnam Veterans against the War (VVAW), in which Kerry tarnished the valor of his brothers-in-arms in order to advance his political career.
As did VVAW, Kokesh's Iraq Veterans against the War (IVAW) holds that America is an imperialistic country, that the military is merely a tool of the government, and that our soldiers are little more than marauders and murderers who, in the words of John Kerry, behave ''in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan.''
I first met Adam when he and a motley group of Code Pink, MoveOn.org, IVAW (Iraq Veterans against the War), and other ''representatives'' of radical anti-American organizations formed up in front of the Army recruiting station in Washington, DC. Their clear intent was to create a disturbance, but the presence of a few dozen Gathering of Eagles members caused them to reconsider their plans.
I approached Adam and struck up a conversation, during the course of which I learned that he considered himself to be a libertarian. I replied that I considered myself a libertarian, as well, and that perhaps we could agree to disagree on the specific issue of the Iraq war. He seemed amenable to that, but his group reconvened in front of the recruiting station a few weeks later and trashed the place. It was then that I realized that the Adam Kokeshes of the world cannot be relied upon to compromise.
The next time I encountered Adam was last summer at an economic conference in St. Louis. That was when I first learned that he was running for Congress. He presided over a "promote Kokesh" seminar that I attended. He spouted off a basic libertarian message without including any of his own biography, which is, to say the least, nasty. Significantly, he claimed to have been honorably discharged as a sergeant from the US Marine Corps. Both claims are false, as will be demonstrated below.
Adam Kokesh is, in my view, a traitor to his country, and certainly to the United States Marine Corps, in which he "served" as a reservist for several months in a civil affairs unit in Iraq. Upon returning to the States, he enrolled in Claremont McKenna College in California.
While at Clarement McKenna, a pistol was stolen from his car, and Adam dutifully reported the theft to the campus police, who asked him where the pistol came from. Adam said that it was a war souvenir from Iraq, and it was not long before the USMC brought charges against him for smuggling an illegal weapon into the US. His then-pending discharge as a sergeant was changed to that of a corporal.
Adam just didn't know when to let well-enough alone, because in 2007 he was involved in a street demonstration in DC in which several anti-war protesters were arrested. It seems that he was involved in a bit of street theater in which he led a "combat patrol," in uniform, to protest the Iraq War. This event was sufficient newsworthy as to cause the Marine Corps to investigate Adam's involvement in what was obviously an unpatriotic act.
It seems that when the Marine major assigned the investigation contacted Adam by e-mail, Adam replied with a "f__k yourself," and the Corps thereupon initiated proceedings that resulted in his having his theretofore-honorable discharge downgraded to a general discharge.
Adam then continued to drive nails into his political coffin, as evinced by his visit to the US Army Garrison in Ansbach, Germany. His actions there were, by any measure, seditious, if not downright treasonous. In his own words, Kokesh imparted the following message to our troops:
"We are here to reach out to active duty members of the United States military stationed in Germany and let them know what they can do to help stop the US occupation of Iraq. Soldiers need to know that when they decide to resist, they will have the support and thanks of the global moral majority. We are also here to support the German peace movement. As in the United States, protestors are often dismissed as ignorant and childish, but with the voices of veterans backing them up, they have the credibility they deserve. It is clear that real change will not come from your government or ours, but rather from the righteous voice of compassion."
"The people of Ansbach have chosen to stand up not only to the imperialism of the United States, but also their own country's history of complicity. The US military has long chosen its own tactical advantage over the consideration of the people in the communities that it affects and claims to protect. It is sad that it has taken so long for Germans to make this stand, but we support them in their opposition."
"Germany has long been complicit in America's aggression. There is no longer any valid premise for the vast American presence in this country. It is not for your security or benefit, but supposedly for the benefit of America, and it is not in the world's best interest. The lesson of World War II should not be to remain silent during the next war of aggression." [Adam Kokesh; May 13, 2007; US Army Garrison, Ansbach, Germany]
A complete account may be viewed here:
http://www.ivaw.org/membersspeak/important-message-people-germany.
His personal report is at http://www.ivaw.org/node/787.
Adam Kokesh probably wishes that he had not been so open about his disloyalty, because he is now pretending to be a patriotic, libertarian-leaning, conservative Republican in his congressional campaign. Sorry, Adam; that just won't wash. You have shown your true colors, and America-loving patriots just won't let you get away with your masquerade.
Go ahead and renew your ties with the Code Pink/Winter Soldier/George Soros/IVAW crowd. Take off that suit and tie, and let your hair grow long in a John Kerry-lookalike manner. Be what you want to be, as long as it's not pretending to be an American patriot.
Larry Bailey
Captain (SEAL), USN (Ret.)
Chocowinity, NC
American Patriots Against Kokesh
The Communist in Our White House
By Bubba on Mar 8, 2010 | In Corruption Culture, Obama, Tea Party | Leave Comment »
Posted by permission of the author,
Richard Newton, The Right Side of the Issues
There are those among us who would argue that we are in the midst of a second American revolution – a revolution to reject and discard conservative values and principles, our Constitution, and our freedoms. Those instigating the revolution, however, will not declare their full intentions until they are convinced that they have a virtual stranglehold on our country. To do otherwise, would be to awaken a sleeping giant.
And so, the time is now - for American conservatives and Tea Party patriots to awaken the giant. Yes, some successes are clearly visible, particularly in terms of recent election results and in the prospects for further election victories for conservatives in November. But mere voting will not suffice if we fail to address the complacency that allowed this cancerous revolution to grow in the first place. It exists not only in government, but more importantly, in our schools and our media. It is time to awaken America from its self-induced stupor of apathy. It is time for all freedom-loving Americans to pay attention to the world around them, to become better informed, and to take personal responsibility for maintaining our freedom.
We cannot afford to assume that good, honest people will guide our country as they have for the better part of 234 years. We cannot afford for people to turn off their listening to politics, whether it be for lack of understanding, lack of interest, or desire to avoid confrontation. We cannot afford to bypass voting in seemingly unimportant local and primary elections. We cannot afford a reliance upon ‘the other guy’ to serve in public roles or to be advocates for various issues. We cannot afford to blindly accept the biased drivel of liberal hacks in the media. And we cannot afford to allow the increasingly liberal influence in academia to destroy the learning and moral fiber of our children. We must understand what we believe in, take ownership for its manifestation and survival, and share information that furthers the success of that survival.
In writing frequently about the liberal hijacking of our present society, I am often puzzled by so many pundits who have tiptoed around the use of definable terms such as socialist, Marxist, communist, collectivist, etc. Even in the 2008 presidential primaries and general elections, the closest most candidates or pundits would get to defining Obama was the ‘s-word’. Is it some McCarthy-like phobia that prevents the application of an all-to-accurate label describing a left-winger’s ideology? We know that leftist political candidates shun the ‘liberal’ label – it’s a known negative connotation to the majority of Americans. More recently, many lefties such as Obama and Hillary have donned the ‘progressive’ label. And thanks to our friend, Glenn Beck, that will soon likely become a new curse for politicians.
But why has there been such a hesitancy use to the ‘communist’ and ‘Marxist’ labels? To their credit, Beck, Levin, and Rush flirt with both of these labels, but this video by Victoria Jackson leaves little doubt and is much more than a hoot – it’s a clarion call to all the sleepy-eyed, apathetic Americans who think the Obama/Pelosi/Reid triumvirate and all the socialist minions in Congress are a harmless, passing fad.
It’s also a wakeup call for all Democrats who let their party loyalty create such a blind spot that they can’t differentiate ‘Hopey/Changey’ slogans from Marxist ideology and who can’t recognize a communist when they’re spewing their propaganda right in front of them, lying through their teeth with every breath, and steadily, intentionally causing the collapse of our economy and freedoms.
Certainly, this video is not going to change minds on its own merit. One must also have been paying attention to the continual barrage of Obama’s Marxist messages/actions and his cadre of radical associates and influences. Consider the following:
- The manifestation of Obama’s collectivist doctrine of transformation in our schools. Glenn Beck’s March 5th episode brought Obama’s tactics into clear focus. A champion of freedom does not belittle the knowledge and influence of the parents nor subjugate their role in raising children to that of the state.
- His infamous SEIU address where he reaches into his oratorical bag of tricks for what Harry Reid would likely describe as his ‘ghetto dialect’ – and proceeds to offer a freedom-threatening, narcissistic message to his following of union goons on how he will overthrow this country.
- His pre-election proclamation that we are “five days away from fundamentally transforming America”. It was not a promise of fighting for freedom and opportunity – it was a threat of chains and control.
- His insistence to undertake unfathomable debt – debt that no reasonable person would ever mimic in their personal finances and debt to which only a person who is hell-bent on collapsing our economy would aspire.
- His insistence to urgently pass a massive ‘stimulus’ bill that to this date remains largely unspent and exists as a convenient slush fund for his pet projects and ‘negotiations’/bribes.
- His desire to reduce our nuclear defenses and to remove defensive shields in eastern Europe.
- His gracious, unapologetic acceptance of a book from avowed Marxist Hugo Chavez – a true patriotic leader would have simply said “No thank you.” and turned away.
- Apologizing for America’s successes, our Exceptionalism, and our foundation of Christianity.
- Lying to shun the use of a 51-vote majority – except when it’s convenient to pass healthcare legislation that the majority of the country opposes – to call it democracy in action, but conveniently forgetting that we are not just a democracy, but a democratic republic. He refuses to acknowledge the majority opposition in this country to his proposal to destroy healthcare and grow the government.
- His appointments of numerous communists and extreme leftists to his administration.
- His preference in school to associate with the Marxist professors.
- His mentoring by communist Frank Marshall Davis and his association with such societal deviates, radicals, and criminals such as William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Rashid Khalidi, and Tony Rezko.
True to his history, beliefs, and associations, Obama has left a trail of Marxist stains at every turn in his presidency. And to that minority of people who actually recognize and subscribe to the radical transformation that this president is attempting to impose upon us, be aware that those of us who cherish our country, our freedoms, and our Constitution are prepared to defend them with every ounce of energy and commitment that we can muster. But we must act with determination now. This is not a mere contest of ideologies nor of compatible belief systems that can survive through bipartisanship – rather, this is a battle for the survival and control of our nation. And make no mistake about it, we will defeat whosoever gets in the way – one way or another.
.
.
.
Kokesh: More History on the Commie RINO
By Bubba on Mar 6, 2010 | In Commies, RINOs, Pauly-Jonesy, Kokesh | Leave Comment »
Adam Kokesh wants to be a US congressman next year. So today he is practicing being a conservative Republican. I say practicing because it was only a year ago or so that he wanted to be a communist.
Poor feller can't make up his mind. I reckon he's still in search of himself?
Saying Kokesh wanted to be a communist is a rather strong accusation, isn't it? It's warranted. I've told you in several recent posts about his involvement with the anti-war movement, that he marched with and led demonstrations by thousands of leftists, anarchists, communists and old worn out 60's hippies. I've told you that I have witnessed with my own hazel eyes the betrayal of Kokesh.
Do you think I'm just making this up?
Are you familiar with ANSWERCoalition?
Click over to DiscoverTheNetworks and read about that fine group of traitors known as ANSWER.
Here's a few excerpts:
Anti-war front group for the Marxist-Leninist Workers World Party
...
ANSWER views the United States as a racist, imperialist, sexist, homophobic nation and the world's chief violator of human rights -- guilty of unspeakable atrocities, past and present, foreign and domestic.
...
ANSWER supports an immigration policy that calls for open borders as well as amnesty and full civil rights for illegal aliens residing in the United States.
...
ANSWER opposes the U.S. military's detention center at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba.
Make notes of all the Marxist, socialist and communist organizations that share board members with ANSWER.
Then make note of this:

That's Adam Kokesh making protest signs in the ANSWER workshop in preparation for the antiwar protest I told you about here.
And don't forget that I also told you that Kokesh enjoys the endorsement of Ron Paul and has in turn endorsed N.C. Congressional candidate B.J. Lawson.
I wouldn't let a commie set foot in my yard, much less march with them, much less endorse one for congress, much less accept endorsement from one.
~~ photo via AmericanPatriotsAgainstKokesh ~~
9/11 Families Reject Adam Kokesh as a Serious Candidate for Congress
By Bubba on Mar 3, 2010 | In Cults, Commies, Liberal Monsters, Pauly-Jonesy, Kokesh | Leave Comment »
» Adam Kokesh ‘runs’ for Congress; is an antiwar activist seeking to return Ben Lujan to the House?
Is Kokesh a grass roots fiscal conservative or an antiwar activist masquerading as a conservative-libertarian to deceive the people of New Mexico? Before voters there decide, perhaps they should review his multiple arrests — including for smuggling home a firearm — in addition to his anti-war protests while in uniform, anti-military recruitment actions, and travel to an allied nation to encourage U.S. soldiers stationed there to go AWOL.
I was at the Capital on September 15, 2007 when ANSWER, Code Poink, SDS, several thousand avowed communists and Adam Kokesh pitched their anti-war hissy fit. I was there as a member of the Gathering of Eagles, assigned to stand with and protect a group of Gold Star moms who were protesting the use of their fallen sons’ images and names by Adam’s comrades.
You would assume that Gold Star moms would need no protection, that they could expect nothing but respect from any American, right? Wrong. I watched and listened to those vile creatures as they marched past, shouting and cursing at these ladies. They spat, and jeered. They yelled “your son got what he deserved”.
We were several hundred American patriots, surrounded by thousands of anti-American leftists. I argued with punks that were mad that I called them commies, they told me I had no right to call them that – even though they carried Soviet flags.
Adam Kokesh was not just one of them, he was one of their leaders. He marched with anarchists, communists and troop-haters.
Now he’s a conservative Republican tea-partier? Oh hell no, I am not stupid. Said Fletcher to the Union Senator, “There’s another old saying Senator … don’t piss down my back and tell me it’s raining.”
Kokesh is a narcissistic, opportunistic parasite. He will take sides with whoever, whatever makes him feel good at the moment. That he has the backing of the Ron Paul cult is fitting, peas in pods.
On Adam Kokesh: Open Letter from Gathering of Eagles
By Bubba on Feb 24, 2010 | In Corruption Culture, Liberal Monsters, Pauly-Jonesy, Kokesh | 1 feedback »
An Open Letter to the Republican Party
Regarding Adam Kokesh
We are writing to you, to express our grave concerns about Adam Kokesh, who is aspiring to become the Republican nominee for US Congress from New Mexico’s 3rd district. Mr. Kokesh has an extensive and well-documented history of affiliations with radical leftist groups. In concert with these groups he has engaged in numerous anti-America and anti-military demonstrations and protests. Moreover, Mr. Kokesh does not appear to have any personal qualifications that would recommend him for serious consideration as a candidate for the Republican Party. He has a significant history suggestive of poor character and judgment, and he has notable incidents of direct activism against Republican office holders.
Affiliations with radical leftist groups
Mr. Kokesh joined the Iraq Veterans Against War (IVAW) in February 2007, at which time he was 25 years old. The IVAW was formed by the Vietnam Veterans Against War (VVAW), the now infamous group, formed by John Kerry in 1970, and responsible for the fraudulent maligning of our Vietnam veterans at the Winter Soldier Conference in 1971. It will be recalled that John Kerry now stands exposed as having repeated false accusations from that conference, during Congressional testimony in 1971. Similar to the VVAW, the IVAW is a virulently anti-military, anti-America group. It holds the view that our country is an imperialistic and expansionistic “One World Order” government, and that our military is but a tool of this government. Further, they believe that our soldiers are little more than marauders and murderers who, in the words of John Kerry, behave “in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan”.
Mr. Kokesh was active in the IVAW from 2007 to 2009, at which time he announced his candidacy for Republican Congressman from New Mexico. There are no indications that he has revoked his affiliations with the IVAW. As an active member of the IVAW, Mr. Kokesh was involved in numerous anti-military, and by explicit extension, anti-Bush/Republican activities and actions. While executing these actions, Mr. Kokesh knowingly and gladly, made common cause with a wide array of other well-known, radical anti-America and communist groups. The list of these other groups includes, but is by no means limited to, the following:
SDS
Code Pink
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition
United for Justice and Peace
Communist Party of America
Muslim Brotherhood
Black Panthers
In cooperation with the above-named groups and the IVAW, Mr. Kokesh: participated in multiple anti-war demonstrations in Washington DC, and other cities throughout the country; organized and incited violent demonstrations at military recruiting stations; participated in an initiative to encourage active duty soldiers to desert their military post; organized and participated in a Winter Soldier Conference 2, an effort designed to malign and undercut the moral of our soldiers who were fighting and dying on the battlefield. Even a most cursory search of the Internet will yield a plethora of documents attesting to the veracity of these assertions.
Character Issues
Mr. Kokesh’s personal accomplishments and achievements appear to be limited to his having served in the Marine Corps from 1999 until 2006, and his work as a political activist with the IVAW, from 2007 until 2009. His MC service was basically unremarkable, in terms of citations, medals, and commendations, and it was ultimately marked by a demotion in his discharge rank from Sergeant to Corporal, and a downgrading of his discharge status from honorable to general. Mr. Kokesh’s tenure with the IVAW has been noted above and need not be repeated here.
There are no indications that Mr. Kokesh has ever maintained any private sector employment, and unless otherwise proven, it might be assumed that his ‘work’ with the IVAW was financed through contributions to that organization, finances that often originated in leftist organizations such as MoveOn.org.
Other than an undergraduate degree in Psychology, there are no indications that Mr. Kokesh has achieved any academic standing that might, given his young age and his otherwise lack of general accomplishments, recommend him for serious consideration for Congress.
There are numbers of incidents in Mr. Kokesh’s personal life that suggest that he employs poor judgment. Examples of this include the following: he smuggled a gun home from Iraq, and then was apprehended when he bought it onto a college campus; he has incited protestors to engage in violent actions against military recruiting stations; and, he incited unrest on a college campus by hanging racist poster around the campus, and signing the posters as being from a member of the college’s conservative Republican organization.
Finally, there is no documented evidence that Mr. Kokesh has been supportive of the Republican Party prior to his campaign announcement in 2009. Yet, there are notable prior incidents in which he has joined with radical leftists in protesting Republican office holders. These include: a high-profile media mocking of Alberto Gonzales’s testimony to Congress regarding the dismissal of the U.S. attorney’s; interrupting John McCain’s acceptance speech at the 2008 Republican National convention; and; participating in a radical left anti-war march on the Bush home in Kennebunkport, Maine.
Given the above, it is our position that Mr. Kokesh is in no way qualified to represent the Republican Party in Congress. In fact, if his history is any indicator of his future performance, it is most likely that he will behave in a manner that is antithetical to the positions and values of the Republican Party. In our view, a Kokesh candidacy will at best, precipitate much conflict within the Republican Party, and, at worst, invite derision from outside of the party.
Like you, we are interested in maintaining the integrity of the Republican Party. We understand that this is a time when the party leadership is striving to reconcile disparate ideas within the party, and to clarify its unified voice. A Kokesh candidacy would be completely at odds with those strivings and ideals.
We are urging the Republican Party to withhold any endorsement of a ‘Kokesh for Congress’ candidacy. We look forward to hearing from you.
.
Kokesh for Congress? No thanks, we already have enough immoral narcissists in D.C.
By Bubba on Feb 11, 2010 | In Aggregates, Corruption Culture, Commies, RINOs, Dhimmitude, Pauly-Jonesy, Kokesh | 4 feedbacks »
After spending most of the last decade in the company of communists and anti-American groups like CodePink, ANSWER, Moveon.org, SDS and IVAW, Adam Kokesh is now a conservative republican running for congress.
Donkey Doodle!
Adam thinks we are stupid, or more specifically, he thinks New Mexico conservatives are stupid enough to believe that he has changed colors. Does he expect forgiveness for his association with commies, America-Bashers and Troop Haters? If so, he's forgotten to actually ask for it.
» Say NO!! to IVAW's Adam Kokesh, "Republican"?!!!! for Congress?
Note that Kokesh has the endorsement of Ron and Rand Paul? Does that means he's abandoned his old anti-war commie buds to hang with 9/11 truthers and Jew Haters. No way! Why would he? Truthers and anti-semites mix rather well with communists.
» DPNM: “Who is Adam Kokesh to lecture anyone on corruption?”
» Mullins: Kokesh’s actions “dishonor the military”
Kokesh has a national base of Tea Party advocates, but Mullins describes himself as an organizer in the Farmington Tea Party movement.
Wrong. Kokesh has a national base of Tea Party Infiltrators and usurpers.
Established on February 10, 2010 : American Patriots Against Kokesh
Not Exactly ...
By Bubba on Feb 9, 2010 | In Obama | Leave Comment »
This one has been circulating the email networks for a while, and for good reason.
1. "Selma Got Me Born" - NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965. (Google 'Obama Selma' for his full
March 4, 2007 speech and articles about its various untruths.)
2. "Father Was A Goat Herder" - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.
3. "Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter" - NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.
4. "My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom" - NOT EXACTLY, your cousin Raila Odinga, has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya. It is the first widespread violence in decades. The current government is pro-American, but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Obama, is Odinga's follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on the phone
Check out the following link for verification of that, and more. Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers burned Christians' homes and then burned men, women and children alive in a Christian church where they took shelter.
Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before the election process her started.
Google http://www.google.com/Obama - Obama and Odinga; see what you get. No one wants to know the truth.
5. "My (black) Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian" - NOT EXACTLY, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5 am, according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.
6. "My Name is African Swahili" - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. 'Hussein' is also Arabic and so is 'Obama'.NOTE: BARAK OBAMA or UBAMA in fact translates "lightening from heaven" See Luke 10:17-18
Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. He is the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian (from his mother's side) and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro (from his father's side). While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya, his father's family were mainly Arabs... Barack Hussein Obama's father wasonly 12.5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro).
7. "I Never Practiced Islam" - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years, until your wife made you change, so you could run for
office. Question; Does that mean he was married as a muslin in his church of 20 years, or have I got that confused ??)
8. "My School In Indonesia Was Christian" - NOT EXACTLY, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book). February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as 'one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.' This is just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says 'Obama's narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts.'
9. "I Was Fluent In Indonesian" - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says that you could speak the language.
10. "Because I Lived In Indonesia, I Have More Foreign Experience"- NOT EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons??
11. "I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs" - NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.
12. "I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion" - NOT EXACTLY, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya, and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.
13. "An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office" - NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and apparently never did, exist..
14. "A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life" - NOT EXACTLY, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and apparently never did, exist.
15. "I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08" - NOT EXACTLY, here you are, despite saying, live on TV, that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.
16. "Voting 'Present' is Common In Illinois Senate" - NOT EXACTLY, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES.
17."Oops, I Mis-voted" - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your mis-vote.
18. "I Was A Professor Of Law" - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer - - ON LEAVE.
19. "I Was A Constitutional Lawyer" - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer - - ON LEAVE.
20. "Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill" - NOT EXACTLY, you didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it.
21. "The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass" - NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days from start to finish.
22. "I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill" - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.
23. "I Have Released My State Records" - NOTEXACTLY, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.
24. "I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess" - NOT EXACTLY,you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens. You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.
25. "My Economics Bill Will Help America" - NOT EXACTLY, your bills economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, - - and even YOU voted against your own bill.
26. "I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois" - NOT EXACTLY, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part during your time in the State Senate.
27. "I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year" - NOT EXACTLY, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.
28. "No One on My Campaign Contacted Canada about NAFTA" - NOT EXACTLY, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.
29. "I Am Tough On Terrorism" - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel.
30. "I Want All Votes To Count" - NOT EXACTLY, you said let the delegates decide..
31. "I Want Americans To Decide" - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.
32. "I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate" - NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.
33. "I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics" - NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you in Illinois.
34. "I Don't Take PAC! Money" - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.
35. "I Don't Have Lobbyists" - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.
36. "My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad" - NOT EXACTLY, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple (http://www.apple.com/>) in one afternoon.
37. "I Have Always Been Against Iraq" - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.
38. "I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care" -NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it.
This is an election year for Congress. Make sure you're registered and ready. If we are to have a chance to restore this country to any sort of order, it must be now. In 2 more years, there will be nothing left to restore. Let's remind everyone in Washington and all of Obama's banking cronies that "Paybacks are Hell". Every politician that helped put this lying bum in office needs to feel the heat!!
... except in the mind of Congressman Brad Miller
By Bubba on Feb 6, 2010 | In Corruption Culture, Liberal Monsters | Leave Comment »
Michael Volpe, writing for BigGovernment has spent a couple of years scraping the dirt from a story in Pennsylvania. This story involves a chain of events that lead to North Carolinians in dire need of a new congressman. North Carolina needs to be One Miller Lite.
Rep. Brad Miller and Dr. Anna Chacko: The Politicalization of Government Health Care
Late in the afternoon of December 4th of 2006, laboratory staff of the Veterans Administration Pittsburgh Health Services (VAPHS) based on an order from Dr. Mona Melhem, the associate chief of clinical services, a few minutes earlier – in less than three hours destroying a unique collection of legionella and other isolates that had been collected by two prominent infectious disease researchers over their nearly three decades of research.
What, one might ask, does an investigation into a destroyed strand of legionella have to do with the firing of the chief of radiology at a hospital nearly two years later? In reality, the two probably have little do with each other, except in the mind of Congressman Brad Miller. Because Miller made a connection, the events of one lead directly to the events of the other.
Click the link, and read the whole thing. If you're in North Carolina, that's just one more reason to start working on ridding our state of Brad Miller.
PBO Bingo
By Bubba on Jan 27, 2010 | In Obama, Just Sayin' | Leave Comment »
Rush Radio 106.1FM (WRDU.com) has downloadable PBO Bingo Cards!
Get your one-Of-A-Kind P-Bo B-I-N-G-O Cards ... Play along tonight while watching the State Of The Union Address.
Congressman David Price is Wrong
By Bubba on Jan 24, 2010 | In Corruption Culture, Tea Party, Roche for Congress | 1 feedback »
Congressman David Price (D-NC) did a town hall meeting, of sorts, at the Cultural Center of Holly Springs. I didn't make the trip, (had to work, some of us still think we should pay our own mortgage) but the Tea Party did.
Among the T-baggers were NCFreedom members and Randy Dye of Randy's Right Blog. Randy made the video linked here, so we can all share and enjoy the embarrassment of a pure liberal congressman being questioned up close and personal.
I note that when asked about constitutional authority to pass Health Care, Price fell back on the Commerce clause and then the insinuation of precedent based on the unconstitutionality of social security. Both of those arguments are lame.
Does Price really believe that one constitutional violation sets precedent for more? That's what he's saying. And that is wrong. Price is wrong.
Let's get Frank Roche's take on that, shall we?
I also note that there were no Price supporters present, or if there were they kept quiet and stayed out of range.
.
.
.
The War on ACORN
By Bubba on Jan 22, 2010 | In Corruption Culture, Commies, Liberal Monsters, ACORN | 1 feedback »
ACORN Filmmakers Giles, O’Keefe Sued in Philadelphia Federal Court
Hannah Giles and James O’Keefe III, the independent filmmakers behind the series of videos which swept the nation in 2009 and exposed internal corruption and illegality within ACORN Housing Corporation, were sued today in federal court in Philadelphia by an ACORN employee featured in one of the pair’s films.
Read the entire linked article.
Giles and O'Keefe did what many have tried to do for over a decade: Expose the corruption of the ACORN organization to the general public. ACORN has access to billions of dollars of liberal money, not to mention a few billion of YOUR money.
Now it's our turn to strike a few blows.
Click Here to donate to Hannah Giles Legal Defense Fund
Click Here to donate to James O'Keefe Legal Defense Fund
Someday we will think about the socialist tool that was defeated ... and we helped.

















Mike Hendrix of ColdFury.com
Michelle Malkin








































