Categories: Guns, Open Carry, Shall Not Be Infringed
GRNC Alert 06-09-10: Obama Moves to Silence Gun Groups and Other Political Opponents
By Bubba on Jun 9, 2010 | In Guns, Corruption Culture, Tea Party, Shall Not Be Infringed | Leave Comment »
From Grass Roots North Carolina
Obama Moves to Silence Gun Groups and Other Political Opponents
Our friends at Gun Owners of America wanted us to share this
information about this dangerous legislation designed to muzzle you!
Obama Moves to Silence Gun Groups and Other Political Opponents
-- Bill clears committee hurdle, going to the House floor soon
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Fresh from his efforts to seize government control of the health
services sector (ObamaCare) and the financial markets ("finance
reform"), Barack Obama has a new priority: silence his political
opposition.
As satisfying as it was for Obama to seize control of one-sixth of
the economy, he has had to suffer protest from the "little people"
(like us). So he is pushing the Orwellian "DISCLOSE" bill (HR 5175) to
make sure gun groups and other pro-freedom forces cannot mobilize
their members in the upcoming elections.
When Obama says "disclose," what he really means is "disclose gun
group membership lists"
Not surprisingly, these efforts to shut down free speech don't apply
to Obama allies, like Democratic-leaning labor unions. They only apply
to groups which are not reliable Obama allies, like Gun Owners of
America.
But, for those groups whose free speech is targeted for Obama's wrath
under this bill, the consequences are severe:
* Under Title II of the bill, GOA (and other groups, as well as many
bloggers) who merely mention public officials within 60 days of an
election could be required to file onerous disclosures -- potentially
including their membership lists.
* Also under Title II, GOA could be required to spend as much as half
of the time of a 30-second ad on government-written disclosures.
* In addition, Sections 201 through 203 would potentially put the
government's snooping eyes on any American who voices a political
opinion, despite the fact that the Supreme Court, in Buckley v. Valeo,
declared that Americans have a right to voice their opinion to an
unlimited extent, if unconnected with a political campaign.
Here's an idea: If Obama is so irritated at the Supreme Court's
defense of political free speech by groups like GOA, why doesn't he
apply his sleazy new rules to his political allies, as well?
IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED
Please urge your congressman to vote against the anti-gun HR 5175.
This bill has moved out of committee and has now been placed on the
House calendar.
You may find your federal representative at: http://www.house.gov/writerep/
OR
You can use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send a pre-written message to
your Representative.
----- Pre-written letter -----
Dear Representative:
I urge you to oppose HR 5175, a bill that will deny the free speech
rights of all Americans. Under Title II of this bill:
* Groups like Gun Owners of America (and other groups, as well as
many bloggers) who merely mention public officials within 60 days of
an election could be required to file onerous disclosures --
potentially including their membership lists -- even though the
Supreme Court has previously ruled in NAACP v. Alabama that membership
lists (like those of GOA's) are off limits to government control.
* Also, groups like GOA and the NRA could be required to spend as
much as half of the time of a 30-second ad on government-written
disclosures.
* In addition, Sections 201 through 203 would potentially put the
government's snooping eyes on any American who voices a political
opinion, despite the fact that the Supreme Court, in Buckley v. Valeo,
declared that Americans have a right to voice their opinion to an
unlimited extent, if unconnected with a political campaign.
Here's an idea: If Obama is so irritated at the Supreme Court's
defense of political free speech by groups like GOA, why doesn't he
apply the new rules in HR 5175 to his political allies (like the labor
unions), as well?
Suffice it to say, if you care anything about the First or Second
Amendments, you will vote against HR 5175. GOA will be scoring this
vote on their rating of Congress.
Sincerely,
Shall Not Be Infringed. (May 29, 2010)
By Bubba on May 29, 2010 | In Guns, Shall Not Be Infringed | Leave Comment »
... the right of the People to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
When [Mexican president Felipe] Calderon asked that the federal "assault weapon" ban be re-imposed, a very large number of U.S. Representatives and Senators present gave him a standing ovation.
However, on Monday the FBI released crime statistics that should cause the applauding anti-gunners to sit on their hands.
FBI Data Again Shows More Guns = Less Crime
The statistics indicate that between 2008 and 2009, as gun sales soared, the number of murders in our country decreased 7.2 percent. That amounts to about an 8.2 percent decrease in the per capita murder rate, after the increase in our nation's legal and illegal population is taken into account. And it translates into about a 10.5 percent decrease in the murder rate between 2004, when the ban expired, and the end of 2009. And finally, it means that in 2009 our nation's murder rate fell to a 45-year low.
If crime reduction and saving lives were the sole reason behind the anti-gun bigot's campaign, statistics like this FBI report and thousands of reports before would be enough to convince them that their logic is flawed. They would have dropped the subject long ago and moved on to some other stupidity to whine about.
But crime reduction and saving lives are simply the lies behind which they hide their true agenda - disarming the American people.
... murders in big cities declined over 11 percent between 2008 and 2009, translating to over a 12 percent decrease in the big city murder per capita rate. We hope, but don't expect, that the indisputable fact that an increase in gun ownership does not necessarily correspond to an increase in crime, will reduce the frequency of Bloomberg's stunts aimed at gun shows, and Daley's periodic rants against the firearm industry.
You should be asking yourself why the leftists want to disarm the people. Once the people are disarmed, what happens then?
The progressive liberals in congress have demonstrated they have absolutely no regard for the opinions of the people by passing the Hellth Scare bill and making it law. They have shown their disrespect for us nearly every day since gaining power in 2006. We are naught but a source of income to them, the more power they wield over us, the better they like it.
Of all their evil goals, taking our guns is their holy grail; because once they have our guns there will be no dissent, no argument, no tolerance for the mouthy demands for freedom.
Legislation Advances that Could Ban All New Semiautomatic Handguns in New York!
GRNC Alert 05-26-10
By Bubba on May 26, 2010 | In Guns | Leave Comment »
Marriott Disinformation on Signs Coming Down
Read Paul Valone's full article
Marriott tells callers "no firearms" signs coming down as part of
apparent disinformation campaign.
Marriott CEO J.W. Marriott, Jr. linked to gun control group.
Late Monday afternoon an ostensibly apologetic and congenial Keith
Thomas, assistant to CEO J.W. Marriott, Jr., told a Grass Roots North
Carolina board member that Marriott had "stepped on a hornet's nest"
and promised to remove signs prohibiting lawful firearms in hotels
nationwide. Of the Charlotte Marriott City Center, where signs posted
during the NRA convention made inadvertent criminals of
conventioneers, Thomas promised signs had already been removed.
But on Tuesday, signs at Marriott properties - including the
Charlotte hotel - remained in place while Marriott executives became
"unavailable" for, according to office receptionists, a litany of
conflicting reasons. Meanwhile, Charlotte Marriott Director of Loss
Prevention Sammy Jones refused to comment on the status of signs.
Some gun rights supporters are now expressing concerns that the claim
by Thomas was merely a dodge to deflect the thousands of e-mails and
phone calls pouring in from around the country. In addition to the
mounting boycott "going viral" on gun forums, it was featured by
nationally syndicated radio host Tom Gresham on "Gun Talk."
But evidence suggests a more sophisticated corporate disinformation
campaign in operation: By putting out the false message that Marriott
is removing signs, the corporation sought to have gun rights activists
do its bidding by putting out messages to that effect on Internet
forums. Those of us who have spread the "Marriott is pulling signs"
message are, in fact, spreading their disinformation. To counter their
effort, see "Immediate Action Required" below.
MARRIOTT CEO LINKED TO 'COALITION TO STOP GUN VIOLENCE'
In what might explain Marriott International's decision to prohibit
lawful firearms in all of its hotels, a reader recently discovered a
link between its Chairman and CEO J.W. Marriott, Jr. and a longtime
gun control organization, the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, formerly
the National Coalition to Ban Handguns.
Run by longtime anti-gun activists Michael Beard and Joshua Horowitz,
CSGV's recent agenda includes registering private gun sales at gun
shows, banning semi-automatic firearms, mandating "microstamping" of
firearms and generating propaganda against lawful concealed carry.
A March 10, 2010 press release by Marriott lists Mr. Marriott's
accolades and "achievements," including the following:
"Mr. Marriott is actively involved in various boards and councils
including...the board of trustees of the National Urban League..."
Among many left-wing causes advocated by the National Urban League,
it is listed prominently among members of the Coalition to Stop Gun
Violence. Does J.W. Marriott, Jr. know his charitable efforts are
being used to undermine your rights?
IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED
Since Marriott seems to think gun owners are easily fooled, it is
time to redouble our efforts and deliver a clear message by taking the
following actions:
1. Call all Marriott executives on the "Feedback Days" designated
below. If they can make outgoing calls, you aren't really trying. To
avoid charges of "harassment" call each executive only once (presuming
you manage to reach them) and maintain a civil tone. If you don't get
through to them, keep trying. If you can't call during the designated
hours, call whenever you can. Additional Feedback Days may be
designated in the future.
2. Counter Marriott's disinformation campaign: Post the "Marriott
lies to gun owners" message on every forum and blog you can find.
Failure to do so will allow an anti-gun multi-national corporation to
control the message.
CONTACT THESE EXECUTIVES
* Keith Thomas: Reports directly to JW Marriott, Jr. himself. Thomas
can be reached at Mr. Marriott's office at either
keith.thomas@marriott.com or 800-621-0999.
* Kathleen Matthews, Executive Vice President, Global Communications
and Public Affairs:
* Kathleen.Matthews@marriott.com, 301-380-7770. Her assistant,
Marilyn Cole, is available at: marilyn.cole@marriott.com or
301-380-7525.
* Chad Callaghan, Vice President of Loss Prevention:
chad.callaghan@marriott.com. His assistant, Pat Murphy, is available
at 301-380-7814. His pager is: 800-313-9391.
DELIVER THIS MESSAGE
* Keith Thomas, assistant to JW Marriott, promised that signs
prohibiting lawful gun owners from protecting themselves and their
families on Marriott properties would be removed. Not only are the
signs still present, corporate executives have been unresponsive to
gun rights leaders attempting to negotiate removal. If Marriott
executives think gun owners are so easily fooled, they underestimate
the problem on their hands.
* Hilton Hotels, unlike Marriott, has no policy prohibiting firearms
in its hotels. Gun owners will be actively pursuing alternatives to
Marriott.
* Finally, ask what Mr. Marriott knows about his trustee position
with the National Urban League and its participation in Coalition to
Stop Gun Violence efforts to strip you of your rights. If they claim
lack of awareness, will he resign the position now that league
participation is known?
GRNC Alert 05-25-10
By Bubba on May 26, 2010 | In Guns | Leave Comment »
Firearms Emergency No Seizure Bill Reintroduced
HB 2031, NO SEIZURE OF FIREARMS IN EMERGENCY/FUNDS, has been
reintroduced at the behest of GRNC. Primary sponsors for this bill are
Reps: Mark Hilton (R-Catawba), George Cleveland (R-Onslow), Bryan Holloway (R-Rockingham, Stokes) and Jim Gulley (R-Mecklenburg).
This bill is an effort to prevent another situation like that in
King, NC this winter during an ice storm where a declaration of a
State of Emergency resulted in a ban on carrying and sale of firearms
and ammunition.
ACTION REQUESTED
Thank the sponsors of this bill:
* Mark Hilton, Mark.Hilton@ncleg.net
* George Cleveland, George.Cleveland@ncleg.net
* Bryan Holloway, Bryan.Holloway@ncleg.net
* Jim Gulley, Jim.Gulley@ncleg.net
.
.
.
(Sorry) State of the Union
By Bubba on May 4, 2010 | In Guns, mOONbATs iZ sToOpiD, Corruption Culture, Illegal Aliens, Liberal Monsters, Just Sayin' | Leave Comment »
or The Right to Keep and Bear Wasp Spray
Following is an excerpt of an email from a friend in New York.
I did not go to the immigration rally last Saturday because there was a warning that these illegal barbarians would bring weapons, axes and shovels and use them on anyone apposing them. And then around 6:00 P.M. Saturday that lunatic terrorist planted a car bomb just two blocks from where I live. I guess it could have been a big enough fire ball to get my building to. My friends in Montana want me to move but you know when your time is up that's it -- you could be anywhere on this planet. These fat terrorists are everywhere breeding and having a nice time thanks to our open borders and free food and section 8 housing we provide for them.
I did however buy myself a big bottle of wasp spray to keep in my shoulder bag -- just in case things get out of hand.
This is a sad commentary on the state of our Union.
This lady, a natural-born citizen of the United States of America is afraid to appear in public to use her constitutionally protected right of free speech. She is in fear of illegal aliens that have a reputation for quick outbursts of violence against anyone that dares to oppose their demands for free entry, free citizenship ... free everything. These illegals are here - there - because our government of the people, refuses to fulfill their constitutional responsibility to secure our borders.
And to round off the number of constitutional infringements to three, she is reduced to carrying a can of wasp spray to defend herself. Although the 2nd amendment explicitly states that the Right to Keep and Bear Arms Shall Not Be Infringed, the city of New York decided to check rights at the city limits.
No, sorry, dear lady, you can't keep and bear arms because you might end up violating the rights of mexicans who are threatening you harm while being here illegally because your government wants their vote more than it cares about it's constitutional responsibilities.
Bossman, I Wont Be at Work on April 19
By Bubba on Mar 17, 2010 | In Guns, American Patriots, Tea Party, Open Carry | Leave Comment »
I will be on the banks of the Potomac, inches outside of the District of Columbia.
I will be armed to the teeth.
I will be in good company.
I will be at the Restore the Constitution Rally at Ft. Hunt and Gravelly Parks
Pistol loaded, openly carried. Rifle unloaded, slung to rear. Bandoleer of magazines containing ammo. All in accordance with rules below. Please note that guidelines below are subject to final coordination with the Department of the Interior:
Participants and attendees are expected to know and abide by all applicable state and federal firearms laws. None of the information provided below is legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by reading or relying upon this information. If you have questions, then you are expected to know the applicable state and federal firearms laws before attending the event.
Anyone prohibited from possessing a firearm by state or federal law may not possess a firearm at this event.
Participants and attendees may not bring any firearm prohibited by state or federal law.

If you're thinking about it, go read the list of rules and be prepared to abide by them.
Then head over to Muster Outside DC planning site for all the details.
~~ big ole thanks to Big Mike Moseley for the tip ~~
NRA-ILA Alerts
By Bubba on Feb 13, 2010 | In Guns, Open Carry | Leave Comment »
NRA-ILA Alerts
or the smell of charred bread ...
» New Rule on Guns in Parks Takes Effect February 22
On February 22, a new law on guns in national parks takes effect. The law repeals a National Park Service rule that has long prohibited Americans from lawfully possessing firearms in national parks for self-defense.
The new law, passed last spring by an overwhelming bipartisan vote in the U.S. Senate, will allow people to possess, carry and transport firearms in national parks, in accordance with state law.
Cause you know how it burns the lefties' toast to have a new pro-gun law go into effect.
» Contact Starbucks And Protect The Right-To-Carry
Brady Campaign’s latest desperate attempt at relevancy involves a publicity stunt attacking Starbucks for allowing the lawful carry of firearms in its stores as provided for by state law.
They say “It’s everyone’s right to sit in a restaurant or coffee shop with their families without intimidation or fear of guns,”
Oh! I agree! If I can sit in Starbucks with my LEGAL pistol by my side, then I will have much less fear of the guns being carried ILLEGALLY by others.
Members, gun owners, and all freedom-loving citizens should contact Starbucks to thank them for complying with state law, and respectfully encourage the company to stay above the fray into which anti-gun activists are trying to drag them. Click here to do so.
About a month ago, an employee of Hardees told me that she was afraid of me. I asked if she thought I looked mean or was she just afraid of the gun.
"the gun", she said.
"The gun carried legally, in the open, may be the one that saves your life from the gun carried illegally in some gang-banger's underwear."
» Legislation to Repeal Alabama's Ban on Short Barreled Rifles and Shotguns Advancing!
Sponsored by State Representative Jeremy Oden (R-11), HB 2 would amend the Alabama statute that prohibits the possession, sale, receipt, or use of rifles with barrels less than 16 inches long and shotguns with barrels less than 18 inches long. These firearms are already legal under federal law when properly registered.
Rifle length restrictions date back to the 1930's. After prohibition was repealed the government had thousands of 'special' law enforcement officers with no laws to enforce. Thus was born the ATF.
A brand new bureau of ex-tax collectors with guns and badges, given unconstitutional authority to make up their own rules and laws to enforce.
Rifle lengths was one of the seemingly arbitrary laws written by unelected tax collectors ... and one of the anti-gun laws that need to be struck down nationwide.
Obama Pushing a "Radical's Radical" to the Federal Bench
By Bubba on Nov 12, 2009 | In Guns, Commies, Obama | Leave Comment »
This is Grass Roots North Carolina Alert 11-12-09
We wish to bring the following alert sent out by our friends at Gun
Owners of American to your attention.
---------------
Thursday, November 12, 2009
He has been called "extreme" by some. But to others, he's beyond
extreme... he's a "Radical's Radical."
Whatever he is, he could become President Obama's next choice for the
federal judiciary.
This radical is Judge David Hamilton, and he's been nominated for a
position on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Hamilton has made many political enemies on the right, seeing that
his politics are to the far left of the political spectrum. Oh yes,
judges aren't supposed to be political, but this one has engaged in
quite a bit of leftist activism.
His biggest opponent on Capitol Hill is Senator Jeff Sessions of
Alabama, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Based
on his analysis of Hamilton, gun owners should be very concerned about
a judge who is all to willing to "amend the Constitution." According
to Senator Sessions:
Judge Hamilton stated in a 2003 speech that the role of a judge
includes writing footnotes to the Constitution: "Judge S. Hugh Dillin
of this court has said that part of our job here as judges is to write
a series of footnotes to the Constitution. We all do that every year
in cases large and small." In explaining this statement to Senator
Hatch, Judge Hamilton wrote that he believes the Framers intended
judges to amend the Constitution through evolving case law.
Of course, we have seen this pattern time and time again. Judges
ignore the clear wording of the Constitution -- in essence, amending
the Constitution through each new case they decide.
The courts then become the vehicle for rewriting the Second
Amendment!
Not surprisingly, Judge Hamilton's politics are to the extreme, far
left. He spent a brief stint as a fundraiser for ACORN, the
organization that was an aggressive supporter of Barack Obama in the
presidential election. In addition to all the evils surrounding ACORN
is the fact that the organization has lobbied against Second Amendment
rights -- as seen by the New Jersey chapter supporting a
one-gun-a-month ordinance in Jersey City.
Certainly any judicial nomination put forth by our anti-gun President
is suspect, but it's interesting to note who his chief backer is in
the U.S. Senate. It's none other than Senator Richard Lugar of
Indiana, who holds an "F" rating from Gun Owners of America.
Lugar has never failed to support one of Obama's anti-gun
nominations, as evidenced by his votes for Attorney General Eric
Holder, State Department lawyer Harold Koh, Supreme Court Justice
Sonia Sotomayor and the incredibly wacky Regulatory Czar Cass
Sunstein.
On policy questions, Senator Lugar is no better. To wit, he voted
against repealing the gun ban in Washington, DC this year.
Considering Hamilton's extreme track record, it's no wonder that
Senator Lugar -- in introducing Hamilton to his colleagues -- begged
his fellow Senators to ignore the judge's policy views. Lugar asked
them not to base their votes on "partisan considerations, much less on
how we hope or predict a given judicial nominee will 'vote' on
particular issues of public moment or controversy."
Instead, Lugar asked his colleagues "to evaluate judicial candidates
on whether they have the requisite intellect, experience, character
and temperament that Americans deserve from their judges...."
In other words, ignore Judge Hamilton's liberalism and just vote for
him because he's so smart and because he's such a nice guy!
Judge Hamilton's rulings have made a lot of enemies on the political
right, especially the one in Hinrichs v. Bosma where, according to a
November 3 editorial in The Washington Times, he "prohibited prayers
in the Indiana House of Representatives that expressly mentioned Jesus
Christ... yet he allowed prayers which mentioned Allah."
Gun owners have much to be concerned about, as well. Anytime a judge
who believes in rewriting the Constitution is elevated to sit as an
appellate judge, that's a scary thing -- especially given the fact
that most cases never reach the U.S. Supreme Court and are, thus,
decided at lower levels in the federal judiciary.
IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED
* Contact Sen. Kay Hagan 202-224-6342, Fax: 202-228-2563,
http://hagan.senate.gov/?p=contact
* Contact Sen. Richard Burr 202-224-3154, Fax: 202-228-2981,
http://burr.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
----- Pre-written letter -----
Dear Senator:
I urge you to vote against Judge David Hamilton for the Seventh
Circuit Court of Appeals. In addition to opposing his far left views,
I don't appreciate his disdain for the Constitution.
To quote Senator Sessions, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary
Committee:
"Judge Hamilton stated in a 2003 speech that the role of a judge
includes writing footnotes to the Constitution: 'Judge S. Hugh Dillin
of this court has said that part of our job here as judges is to write
a series of footnotes to the Constitution. We all do that every year
in cases large and small.' In explaining this statement to Senator
Hatch, Judge Hamilton wrote that he believes the Framers intended
judges to amend the Constitution through evolving case law."
Of course, we have seen this pattern time and time again. Judges
ignore the clear wording of the Constitution -- in essence, amending
the Constitution through each new case they decide.
The courts then become the vehicle for rewriting the Second
Amendment!
Not surprisingly, Judge Hamilton's written answers to the Senate
Judiciary Committee show his lack of understanding regarding the
Second and Fourteenth Amendments. While Hamilton cannot ignore what
the Supreme Court said in DC v. Heller (2008), he refuses to admit
that the individual right to keep and bear arms applies anywhere
outside of Washington, D.C. -- instead, he just says he will rely on
evolving "case law developed in earlier incorporation cases."
Once again, evolving case law -- more often than not -- takes us away
from what the Constitution actually says.
Please vote NO on David Hamilton.
Sincerely,
----------------------
You may find your NC representative by going here:
http://www.grnc.org/contact_reps.htm
You may write your federal congressman by going here:
.
.
.
Senator Burr Supporting National Park Land Grab Eliminating Hunting Access
By Bubba on Nov 9, 2009 | In Guns | 2 feedbacks »
This is Grass Roots North Carolina Alert 11-09-09
Why Is Burr Supporting Blowing Rock Land Grab?
Senator Burr Supporting National Park Land Grab Eliminating Hunting
Access
As we were alerted by members in the Blowing Rock area months ago, the Town of Blowing Rock plans to turn over town-owned land that local hunters have hunted on for generations to the National Park Service. The issue started nearly a decade ago when the North Carolina Land Trust purchased a 192 acre tract of land from a local hunting club outside the city limits of Blowing Rock. Local hunters, believing they were protecting a treasured hunting area, generously donated to the Land Trust for purchase of the tract. As testament to the past use of hunting on the land, the Land Trust wrote language into their deed which designated hunting as an allowable activity on the land for perpetuity. A few years later however, the Town of Blowing Rock, unbeknownst to the general public, purchased the 192 acre tract from the land trust for potential trade to the National Park Service. In late 2005 the purchase revealed itself to sportsmen when police tried to close the area, including the NC Gamelands portion, to hunting.
Hunters and GRNC members, concerned with suddenly being told they were not allowed to hunt public lands, began questioning recalcitrant town officials. It was then that the questionable land trade was uncovered. Further investigation revealed that an influential town councilwoman's expensive home overlooks the land, as well as the fact this very same councilwoman is an outspoken anti-hunting, anti-logging activist. Some grassroots members are even beginning to question the Town of Blowing Rock's role in the Land Trust's original purchase of the tract. Letters written to Mayor J.B. Lawrence regarding these and other questions have not been answered. The town maintains the trade is necessary to gain full control of the town reservoir located on Park lands between Boone and Blowing Rock. This does not seem plausible given the fact Blowing Rock already has water interconnection permits with Boone as well as an unused intake permit at the confluence of Payne Branch and Middle Fork.
As a new twist, Mayor Lawrence recently declared the 190 acres as closed to hunting via a vague town code prohibiting loaded guns on town property (i.e. town hall). Coinciding with the Mayor's announcement, National Park Service spokeswomen Shelia Dixon indicated that if NPS acquires the land, all hunting, trapping, and shooting will be prohibited as per NPS policy. This deal will cut in half the last public lands that Blowing Rock hunters, shooters and trappers can easily access. Hunters attempted to voice concerns with Mayor Lawrence during a March 10, 2009 town meeting, however the Mayor decided to convene an illegal closed meeting to discuss the issue. No recordings or minutes exist of this meeting.
Now it seems that Senator Richard Burr and Congresswoman Virginia Foxx are on board with this deal as well. Burr's and Foxx's offices purport that their support stems from the dubious water issue. Locals are skeptical about this and again point to the councilwoman's home which overlooks this land. Several times GRNC members have requested from both Burr and Foxx to have a voice in the questionable land deal, but that has not happened.
What Sen. Burr has not addressed is if this is part of a larger bill. If so, he can introduce a floor amendment to remove the land grab and protect the rights of hunters in this area. Remember, this could be your county where this happens next.
IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED
* Call Senator Burr and ask him to remove the Blowing Rock land grab:
(202) 224-3154
----------------------
You may find your NC representative by going here:
http://www.grnc.org/contact_reps.htm
You may write your federal congressman by going here:
http://www.house.gov/writerep/
-------------------
Support these PRO RKBA merchants who, as GRNC sponsors, are
supporting your Second Amendment rights:
Hyatt Coin & Gun Shop, 3332 Wilkinson Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28208,
www.hyattguns.com
Duncan Gun & Pawn, 414 Second St., North Wilkesboro, NC 28659,
www.duncangun.com
Shooter's Express, 2 Caldwell Dr., Belmont, NC 28012,
www.shootersexpress.com
The Aisle Pawn Shop, 216 N. Main St., Mooresville, NC 28115,
Gunner's Alley, LLC, 203 N. Harrison Ave., Ste. 130, Cary, NC 27513,
www.gunnersalley.com
C & E Gun Shows, 4225 Fortress Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24060
http://www.cegunshows.com/
.
.
.
Tennessee, not Playing
By Bubba on Oct 25, 2009 | In Guns, American Patriots | Leave Comment »
» Tennessee launches boycott of 'unconstitutional' federal laws
State Rep. Susan Lynn recently wrote a letter to the other 49 state legislatures, inviting them to join the group and warning that the role of the federal government has been "blurred, bent and breached."
She noted that the Constitution does not include a congressional power to override state laws, nor does it give the judicial branch unlimited jurisdiction over all matters. Attempts to include such provisions in the Constitution were rejected by the Founding Fathers.
"We feel very strongly that the federal government has gone way too far in attempting to regulate a lot of activity that occurs only in-state," added MSSA President Gary Marbut. "The Montana Legislature and governor agreed with us by enacting the MFFA. We welcome the support of many other states that are stepping up to the plate with their own firearms freedom acts."
REMINGTON RECALL
By Bubba on Aug 21, 2009 | In Guns | Leave Comment »

















Mike Hendrix of ColdFury.com
Michelle Malkin












































