The media can only report what law enforcement agencies provide them in terms of information. Unfortunately, many police officers—and most PIOs within police departments—have minimal firearms experience beyond what they learn for their specific duty weapons, and so they tend to give out inaccurate information.
Kind of young to be an uncle, but it would racist of me to say that I disagree with all the leftist (THHO)Obama butt kissers that are calling CJ an Uncle Tom.
And! Did you know that FaceBook considers CJ Pearson an Uncle Tom?
In a soft tyranny, it isn’t necessary for the government to give orders to unplug the microphone on someone like C.J. Pearson. Everyone who identifies with the liberal establishment knows which opinions are correct and which are incorrect, and the more intolerant among them, like the folks running Fakebook, respond as the authorities would desire.
If you’re thinking that this was just an oversight, think again. The secret email account was created on the day she went before the Senate for her confirmation hearings. The account was under a newly registered domain: clintonemail.com.
So, it’s not that some staffer forgot to create an official State Department email address and never got around to it. No, instead they registered an entire web domain in order to avoid obeying the law.
Under the rule of thumb that you can’t believe everything you read on the internet, one must verify some things for one’s self.
In this case it’s easy enough to test the theory that Hillary Clinton violated federal law.
First, to test whether the alleged domain name exists:
It’s also easy enough to find out when that domain was created:
So the next question to be asked is “What difference, at this point, does it make?”
~~ via Mexicans in California Discover Territorial Sovereignty
Unfortunately irony is no substitute for a secure fence and rigorous enforcement of immigration law.
Should we not be flooding Mexican consulates across the nation? Camping in the their lobbies. Raiding their fridges. Using their computers to surf the web. Demand our rights to sit in their chairs. Setup a pig-cooker in their break room and have a party. Shame them into giving us the contents of their wallets.
Then when they call the police, scream bloody-murder-racism.
Before Obama’s promised “fundamental transformation” of America has been completed, this will no longer be an English-speaking nation populated mainly by people of European descent who cherish a heritage of individual liberty. It will be a Third World nation populated by people deliberately imported from the Third World in contravention of the law to displace us. Plans have been laid, and are already being executed
treason on a level never before experienced
Obama blamed the Paris terror attacks on a failure to integrate. But Islamic terrorism is an attempt to integrate Europe into Islam. The bombs and bullets, like the Sharia patrols and the No-Go Zones, are statements by Muslims that they will not be integrated into Europe. Europe must integrate with them.
A Muslim country with a terrorist problem points the terrorists to another country. That’s a major reason why Lebanon, Syria and Iraq are disaster areas. It’s also why our Gulf allies keep funding the terrorists attacking America. Not only is it the religiously devout thing to do and confers geopolitical advantages on them, but it’s also the international equivalent of dumping your toxic waste next door.
The most crucial decision in our approach to Islamic terrorism is to decide whether it represents a foreign or domestic element. If we treat Muslim terrorists as a domestic force, then we will have to cater to them. The path of appeasement will eventually lead to adopting some form of Islamic law even if we do it under the guise of our existing legal system, such as prosecuting blasphemy against Islam under hate crime laws. But as we attempt to manage Islamic terrorism, the violence will increase.
Eventually we will discover that the only way to compete with Al Qaeda or ISIS is to adopt elements of the Islamic program, the way that the West did with the radical left. That is what most Muslim countries have already done. And if we do it, then we will have defeated ourselves. That is why the approach advocated by Obama and the European Union is bound to fail. The United States is not a Muslim country and it cannot afford to manage terror the way that Muslim countries do.
What accounts for the impulse to find excuses for even the most bloodthirsty monster? It’s another way of denying the Islamic character of Islamic terrorism, as if any random person — whether Episcopalian or Buddhist — could have been driven over the edge by such treatment.
It is another way of blaming the West for the enemies besieging it, and so cloud the moral picture.
~~ via Would every non-anti-Semitic donor to UCLA please watch this video?
… according to the above video the only reason being given to oppose the young woman in question was that she was a Jew
The reason why donors should reassess their charitable impulses is because nobody got fired for teaching these kids to be prejudiced against Jews. What, did you think that they learned it on their own?
When SJP talks about justice for Palestinians, they don’t mean justice for the millions of Palestinians living in misery in refugee camps in Jordan and Lebanon. They’re only interested in Palestinians that are connected to Israel– those living in the West Bank and Gaza—because only those Palestinians can accommodate SJP’s agenda to bash the Zionist enemy. Their contempt for Israel knows no bound. I challenge anyone to visit their Web sites, attend their demonstrations or read their literature and find one genuine gesture of recognition for Israel’s side of the story.
here’s a new instrument that is just begging to be played on college campuses and that would surely drive SJP nuts– a new organization called Students for Justice in the Middle East. This is an activist group that would fight for justice for all the oppressed peoples of the Middle East, not just those in the West Bank and Gaza. It would target dictators and oppressors who make Israel look like Cinderella. And it would drive SJP nuts because it would expand the debate beyond Israel.
Right now both Boehner and McConnell are negotiating with themselves over the terms of their own surrender. This did not have to be.
Will Congress acquiesce in letting Obama set his own immigration policy, a policy that runs counter to the law? The only tool Congress has in this battle is the appropriations authority. If it won’t refuse to appropriate money to fund non-essential functions of DHS, it has become irrelevant and we are a dictatorship, not a constitutional republic.
» President Barack Obama’s Complete List of Historic Firsts
» Timeline of Key Events Surrounding IRS Targeting of Conservative Groups
» Palestinians Working for Israelis
» As U.S. Light Dims, A Season Of Assassins
Dissent stopped being patriotic the very second that Obama entered the Oval Office. Suddenly it became unspeakable treason and racist sedition.
Patriotism could be questioned again, but not for the love of country, only for the love of a president.
The patriotism practiced by Republicans was the patriotism of Teddy Roosevelt, standing by the country rather than by a man. And standing by him exactly to the degree in which he stood by the country. That is what Giuliani did. To this the Democrats answered with the patriotism of Obama, launching witch hunts against anyone whose love of Obama appeared to be lacking in sincerity and enthusiasm.
Now the media is questioning Scott Walker’s patriotism. Not his love of country, but his love of Obama.
It has reached such a point that the failure to praise Obama disqualifies a candidate for public office.
Devotion to Obama is not the same as loyalty to your country.
On the contrary, in fact and in reality devotion to (THHO)Obama is the exact opposite of loyalty to America. Period.
Whereas Obama looks to be comfortable with the expansion of Iranian power with proxies in Syria and Lebanon, our allies in Israel may not feel the same way. Obama may be comfortable with the idea that Tehran can develop powerful centrifuges that put them in a position to build a bomb within a year, but that reality is probably unsettling for the Sunnis and Jews in the area. In fact, former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell says that a potential Iran nuclear agreement would limit Iran to the number of centrifuges needed for a weapon but not enough for the imaginary nuclear power program it wants.
there is plenty of criticism aimed at the aggressive methods of Netanyahu in Israel, there will also be widespread agreement among nearly all political denominations in the Jewish state regarding the substance of his speech and the warnings about a nuclear Iran. Surely, hearing out the case of an ally that is persistently threatened by Holocaust-denying Iranian officials doesn’t need to come with this much angst from Democrats. But if it does, it’s worth asking why.
But when you ask, don’t ask Obama, a Dhimmicrat or any other form of leftist. Ask yourself, honestly: why do they so vehemently oppose the destruction of America’s enemies while defending and coddling those enemies?
Pierre Sprey, one of the designers of the A-10 and the F-16, is also critical of Air Force leadership and has stated, “The Warthog is the only plane in the U.S. inventory designed from the ground up to provide true combat-effective CAS. The Air Force’s brass is busy claiming that new high-tech missiles and electronics allow clumsy bombers and fast thin-skinned fighters to support the troops just as well. Recent combat proves that’s just PR spin to defend their pet megabuck procurements.”
“By scrapping the A-10, the Air Force is guaranteeing more Gold Star families will be created.”
The angry students did not clarify in their demands whether they think that the school should be moderating outfit choices for all students at all times, wherever they may be, or if there were a specific distance away from campus that students could safely wear a sombrero without fear of punishment.
The senators are going after anyone who would dare contest the science behind the climate change narrative.
They want it all, and they want it now.
Majority members of the Senate committee reportedly were sending out letters Friday advising the target groups that they do not have to comply with the senators’ unconstitutional requests. Anonymous donations still are protected under the First Amendment.
First Amendment expert Hans von Spakovsky called the senators’ actions “outrageous.”
A federal judge warned the EPA on Monday not to discriminate against conservative groups in how it responds to open-records requests, issuing a legal spanking to the agency that he said may have lied to the court and showed “apathy and carelessness” in carrying out the law.
… accused the agency of insulting him by first claiming it had conducted a full search for records, then years later retracted that claim in a footnote to another document without giving any explanation for how it erred.
“The recurrent instances of disregard that EPA employees display for FOIA obligations should not be tolerated by the agency,”
Judge Lamberth pointedly noted that the EPA delayed some of its follow-through on the request by Landmark until after the 2012 elections and said explanations by several EPA officials for why they failed to live up to the law defied reason.